Return to the publication of numerical exchange rate forecasts

(authors: Jan Filáček, Tomáš Holub, Petr Král)

The CNB started to publish forecasts for the nominal koruna-euro exchange rate in 2009. It thus became the only central bank in the world to publish forecasts for the nominal exchange rate against a specific currency in numerical form. This increase in forecast transparency was useful to analysts and market participants. With knowledge of the exchange rate that the central bank uses in its forecasts, they can better assess how new information affects the balance of risks to the forecast. As a result, they can better understand the Bank Board’s decisions. For example, if the exchange rate is appreciating faster than forecasted but the prediction is materialising in all other respects, it is likely that the central bank will compensate for the greater tightening of the monetary conditions via the exchange rate by tightening policy less via interest rates. If the markets take this into account, their expectations of future interest rate growth will be lowered, which in turn will lessen the rate of appreciation. Therefore, publication of the exchange rate forecast by the central bank has a stabilising effect. This is ultimately beneficial to the whole economy.

The CNB stopped publishing exchange rate forecasts when it adopted its exchange rate commitment in November 2013. At that moment, the exchange rate became a monetary policy instrument and ceased to be a standard forecasted variable. The forecasts at the time assumed that the exchange rate of the koruna would be close to the publicly announced intervention level of CZK 27 to the euro until the exchange rate commitment ended. Publication of the exchange rate forecast – including the simultaneously disclosed confidence intervals in the form of a fan chart – thus temporarily became meaningless.

With this Inflation Report, the CNB is returning to publishing a numerical exchange rate forecast in the form of a fan chart. This move forms part of the normalisation of CNB monetary policy. The time gap between this step and the exit from the exchange rate commitment last April was due to the risk that an exchange rate path published soon after the intervention regime ended could have been misinterpreted by market participants as the central bank’s intended or preferred path. In addition, the confidence intervals in the fan chart could have been misconstrued as sensitivity thresholds, the crossing of which would lead to the CNB returning to the forex market. Moreover, the risks connected with a premature return to publication of the exchange rate forecast were amplified by the fact that interest rates were still at the zero lower bound and monetary policy therefore had no standard instrument for reacting to an unexpected sharp appreciation. However, these risks shrank substantially as the exchange rate turned out to show no major swings and interest rates were increased above technical zero during 2017.

Like the interest rate path, the exchange rate forecast does not constitute any commitment by the CNB and is associated with uncertainty. The future exchange rate path is a part of the CNB’s macroeconomic forecast. In the forecast, it is determined by the expected interest rate differentials between domestic and foreign rates (temporarily including the impact of the ECB’s quantitative easing via shadow rates) and also by the risk premium. The premium reflects, among other things, the evolution of net external assets and hence the trade balance. The exchange rate forecast also takes into account the assumed real equilibrium rate of appreciation of the koruna against the effective euro area (1.5% a year). The effect of these factors on the exchange rate is spread over time so that it reflects the observed exchange rate behaviour (for details, see Box 2 in Inflation Report I/2009). Like the forecasts for all other variables, the exchange rate forecast is conditional on the assumptions of the forecast, including the outlooks for developments abroad. Unexpected shocks may cause the actual exchange rate to deviate in either direction from the forecast (see Chart 1), sometimes significantly. This uncertainty is expressed by the confidence intervals of the forecast, which are published in the form of an exchange rate fan chart in the Summary of the Inflation Report. The width of these intervals is temporarily based on the forecast errors recorded before the exchange rate commitment was adopted.

Chart 1 (Box) Materialisation of koruna exchange rate forecasts
The actual exchange rate usually deviates from the forecast, sometimes significantly
(CZK/EUR)
 

The exchange rate is generally difficult to forecast. In the case of the CNB forecasts published since 2009, the average absolute deviation of the actual exchange rate from the CNB forecast was just below CZK 0.5/EUR on average at the one-quarter horizon and about CZK 1.1/EUR at the one-year horizon. Before the exchange rate commitment was adopted, the forecasts on average expected the koruna to be stronger at both the one-quarter and one-year horizon than it subsequently turned out to be (see Chart 2). In the period of 2012–2013, the CNB’s communication of the possible use of the exchange rate as a monetary policy instrument contributed to these deviations, fostering a gradual weakening of the koruna. The subsequent introduction of the exchange rate commitment in November 2013 and the related sharp depreciation to CZK 27 to the euro were not anticipated by the CNB’s earlier forecasts, so the exchange rate outlooks consistent with those forecasts were heading towards stronger levels. By contrast, in the period before the global financial and economic crisis, and also in 2009–2010, the actual exchange rate usually deviated from the CNB’s forecasts to the stronger side.

Chart 2 (Box) Deviations of the actual exchange rate from the forecast
The accuracy of nominal exchange rate forecasts is naturally lower at the one-year horizon than at the one-quarter horizon
(CZK/EUR)
 

Although the exchange rate forecast may not materialise, it gives market participants a guide to the future monetary policy stance. A deviation of the actual exchange rate from the forecasted path points to a need to change the outlook for the interest rate component of the monetary conditions. This dependence is captured in the Inflation Report by an exchange rate sensitivity scenario and in the period between two forecasts by the Graph of Risks to the Inflation Projection (GRIP; see the Annex to Inflation Report III/2011), publication of which will resume in March 2018.